Comments on: Collision Slow Mo – Toronto Cyclist Sheppard Killed – Bryant On Security Cameras

By: honestedits

honestedits — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:19:48 +0000

You have no proof for anything that you say, its all supposition (imagination) following a veryï»¿ narrow train of thought. Since you are not actually responding to whole sentences, stop spamming this board.Your point that Sheppard “walking away would have solved everything” is a guess and not a fact. I “guess” that Bryant would have reversed, running over Sheppard again as he walked to the sidewalk… seems he had it out for the guy. Thanks for the defense advice pages.

By: liberalrefugee

liberalrefugee — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:22:13 +0000

That really was an accident. A carelessï»¿ accident where he said he wasn’t paying attention and ran a red light. Sounds like he took responsibility instantly. Hands up people. Does Bryant’s ramming of Sheppard look like an accident?

By: honestedits

honestedits — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:42:40 +0000

By a strange coincidence, a US lawmaker sets an example of what is appropriate to do in an incident where he runs into a cyclist.. video is posted on myï»¿ main page.

By: rationibus

rationibus — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:17:12 +0000

Thereï»¿ is no use arguing with a person whose entire premise is a fiction. Hitssquad probably thinks Iraq attacked the US too.

By: liberalrefugee

liberalrefugee — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:50:02 +0000

You’re not worthï»¿ my time. Go read wiki.

By: honestedits

honestedits — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:27:36 +0000

Again? There is no proof yet that Sheppard was physical with Bryant. When there is any, you will have a valid comment.You’ll have to consider the answer to those questions yourself. Whether Sheppardï»¿ was in the right or not at that moment, all of the other events, before and after Sheppard approaching the car is a grievous wrong done by Bryant.

By: hitssquad

hitssquad — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:31:39 +0000

@liberalrefugeeWas Sheppard legally defending himself when he physically attacked Bryant? Was he “repelling forceï»¿ by force”?

By: liberalrefugee

liberalrefugee — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:43:01 +0000

Review the Canadian laws on self defense. Too many people believe that self defense is an all inclusive do anything you want and still stay out of jail free card. It isn’t. Unprovoked? Self-defence against unprovoked assault34. (1) Every one who is unlawfully assaulted without having provoked the assault is justified in repelling force by force if the force he uses is not intended to cause death or grievous bodily harm and is no more than is necessary toï»¿ enable him to defend himself.

By: rationibus

rationibus — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:05:28 +0000

No reason would justify it. The copsï»¿ have taken statements from a number of witnesses. So far every one I’ve heard condemns the driver of the black car.

By: kansas621

kansas621 — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:38:02 +0000

I can’t tell shit from this grainy video. Seems like an unfortunate mishap. Why does a guy just run over somebody for no apparent reason?What about the guy in the video walking across the street? He mustï»¿ have saw something.