Inside A Paparazzi’s Camera Bag


Henry Flores of BUZZFOTO shows you what it takes to be a paparazzi. At least the gear you need. This is a rare look inside a working photographers camera bags, along with the reasons for each piece…

Related Posts

Tags : , ,

Google Reader Yahoo Facebook Twitter Digg FriendFeed Delicious Google Translate
This entry was posted onDecember 2nd, 2009 at 6:35 am. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Responses are currently closed, but you can Trackback..

10 Responses

Comments(10)Trackbacks(0)

  1. JbhFilm

    If you have a job. I’m 14, I just purchased a D5000 and a fisheye.

    December 2, 2009 7:04 am | #1
  2. TravelnDude

    You must have a nice car.

    December 2, 2009 7:40 am | #2
  3. Booyaaa100

    ya youre wrong. the sensor moves to counteract the movement of the camera, its pretty cool, but from what ive read in lens stabilization works much better. feel free to disagree though.

    December 2, 2009 8:28 am | #3
  4. LonGHairedHermeS

    Moving a sensor does not allow for a 100% viewfinder. Plz do not read your information get out and try it yourself. Second dont bug me on a post i made like 3 months ago.

    December 2, 2009 8:56 am | #4
  5. Booyaaa100

    sorry i was just trying to help. but youre right thats why most people who can afford it prefer the in lens stabilization.

    December 2, 2009 9:08 am | #5
  6. Booyaaa100

    i disagree. sony although they do have a some decent lenses, has a huge problem with noise control. anything shot on one of their cameras with an iso higher than 400 is almost unusable because of noise. pentax and olympous are nice, but they dont have many lenses and if you want to move up to a more pro body they dont have anything. i would say go nikon or canon. sure there isnt in camera stabilisation, but they have much better image quality at a high iso and have more options for lenses.

    December 2, 2009 9:49 am | #6
  7. nonplasmaant

    So it’s like back tilt on a view camera?

    December 2, 2009 10:49 am | #7
  8. nonplasmaant

    Because a 14 year old can totally afford a DSLR- especially a D5000, of course!  …

    December 2, 2009 11:08 am | #8
  9. kingocarina

    did this guy snort some coke before recording this?

    December 2, 2009 11:18 am | #9
  10. fallenembers08

    i agree.but nikon and olympus make better and sharper lenses than canon lenses. Canon makes great competitive bodies against nikon. Take the 1Dmk 4 vs the D3s.

    December 2, 2009 11:42 am | #10